An Analysis of Revenue Cycle Internal Controls in Ghanaian Universities

Justice Ray Achoanya Ayam

Abstract


While corporate organisations in recent years have experienced increasing demands for more effective and efficient internal controls aimed at strengthening and enhancing the reliability of financial statement there exist very little empirical studies focusing on the application of the five components of the COSO control framework in Revenue Cycle Internal Controls in Ghanaian University. The study is relevant in increasing the understanding and evaluating internal control effectiveness of Ghanaian Universities. The purpose of this research paper is to assess the level of effectiveness of the Revenue Cycle Internal Control Systems of Universities in Ghana using the Committee of Sponsoring Organisation of the Treadway commission (COSO) control framework in order to provide the basis for streamlining and improving controls in the Universities in Ghana. The study uses primary data collected through a survey instrument from respondents sampled from Universities and University Colleges. The results indicate that all five components of the COSO framework were in place and functioning effectively. The sampled population consist of Ghanaian Universities only, consequently the research outcome may not necessarily represent all Universities in the world. Only selected Universities and University Colleges in Ghana were included in the research, therefore the findings of this study cannot be attributable to all Higher Educational Institutions in Ghana.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aldridge, C. R. and Colbert, J. L. (1994). “Management’s report on internal control and the accountant’s response” Managerial Auditing Journal, 9(7):21-28

Applegate, D. (1999). “Struggling to incorporate the COSO recommendation into your audit process? Here’s one audit shop’s winning strategy.” internal Auditor, pp.15-21.

American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. (1995). “Consideration of Internal Control in a Financial Audit: Amendment to SAS No 55 (SAS 78)”

American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. (1985). Auditing Standards Board, Codification of statements on Auditing Standards.

Colbert, J. L., and Bowen, P. L. (2006). “A comparison of internal controls: CobiT, SAC, COSO and SAS 55/78”, ISACA publication.

Committee of Sponsoring Organisations of the Treadway commission (COSO), Internal control-Integrated Framework, Coopers and Lybrands, 1(4).

Galloway, D. J. (1994). “Control models in perspective” Internal Auditor, pp. 46-52.

Gelinas, U. J., Sutton, S.G. and Hunton, J. E. (2005). Accounting Information Systems, South western publication.

Geiger, M. A., Cooper, S. M., and Boyle, J. E. (2004). “Internal control components: did COSO get it right?” The CPA Journal, pp. 28-31.

Hunton, J. E., Bryant, S. M., and Bagranoff, N. A. (2004). Core concepts of information Technology Auditing, Willey International edition, John Willey & Sons Inc.

http//www.sec.gov/about/laws/soa2002.pdf, “Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002”.

IFAC. (2003). “Rebuilding Public confidence in Financial Reporting: An international perspective”.

Information System Audit and Control Foundation. (1995). “CobiT: Control Objectives for Information and related Technology.

Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation. (1991). Revised 1994, “Systems Auditability and Control.

Jefferson Wells International. (2005). “Sarbanes-Oxley: The Case for independent internal Auditor and COSO-Based internal control.

Johnson, D. M. (1992). “Professionalism in the third world”, internal auditor, 49:18-21.

Koehn, L. J. and Delvecchio, S. C. (2006). “Revisiting the ripple effect of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act”, CPA Journal, May 2006 issue.

Miller, R. K., and Paskoff, P. H. (2002). “Regulation under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act” Journal of Accountancy, 194(4):33-36.

Pricewaterhouse Coopers. (2006). “Comments, Re-Internal Control-Integrated Framework: Guidelines for smaller public companies reporting on internal control over financial reporting.

PriceWaterhouseCoopers, “IT Governance Global Status Report-2006”.

Price Waterhouse Coopers, “Information Security breaches survey 2006”, Technical report.

Rezaee, Z. (1995). “What the COSO report means for internal auditors”, Managerial auditing Journal, 10(6):5-9

Robson, C. (1993). Real world Research: A Resource for social scientist and Practitioner Researchers, Oxford: Blackwell.

Security and Exchange Commission. (2003). “release No 33-8238, June 5, 2003.

Tone at the Top. (1998). “Does your Control System pass the COSO Test?” The Institute of Internal Auditors, issue 2.

Yakhou, M., and Dorweller, P. V. (2004). “Dual reforms accounting and corporate governance”, Managerial auditing Journal, 9(3):361-377.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/csbm.v2i2.7320

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2015



Case Studies in Business and Management    ISSN 2333-3324    E-mail: csbm@macrothink.org

Copyright © Macrothink Institute 

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'macrothink.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.