Occupational Exposure to Steady Magnetic Fields and Mental Health of workers at the Copper Electrolysis Unit
Abstract
Background: There are a few studies about the health effects of steady magnetic fields. This study was performed in order to evaluate some of the mental effects of exposure to steady magnetic fields in the copper electrolysis unit.
Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive and analytical study was performed at the electrolysis unit of a Copper Complex in Kerman Province in 2013. The populations under study were ninety workers exposed to steady magnetic fields chosen as the exposed group and 90 workers without exposure chosen from the concentration unit and similar to the exposure group in regard to working conditions. The intensity of steady magnetic field was measured in different parts of the saloon and in the head, waist and feet position. Measuring mental signs was performed by the General Health Questionnaire GHQ-28. Data analysis was performed through SPSS19 and the Mann-Whitney U, one way ANOVA, Chi-square test and Regression analysis was used.
Results: In this study the mean intensity of the steady magnetic field in the exposed group was 2.5 mT. The mean rank of mental health in the exposed group was 102.04 and in the unexposed group was 78.96 and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.003). Also there were statistical differences between the two groups in anxiety and sleep disorder (p=0.001) and depression (p=0.007) dimensions.
Conclusion: It appears that exposure to static magnetic fields can cause psychological complications. Therefore, more research is recommended to improve the safety of workers exposed to these fields.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
International Commission on Non-ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). Guidelines on limits of exposure to static magnetic field. Health physics. 2009; 96: 504-14.
World Health Organization. Environmental health criteria 232. Static fields Geneva: World Health Organization. 2006.
Feychting M. Health effects of static magnetic fields—a review of the epidemiological evidence. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology. 2005; 87: 241-6.
Mottelay PF. Bibliographical history of electricity and magnetism chronologically arranged. London: Charles Griffin & Co; 1922.
Swerdlow AJ. Report of independent Advisory Group on Non-ionising Radiation. Static Magnetic Fields. London: Health Proetection Agency. 2008.
John F, Schnck MD. Invited Safety of Strong, Static Magnetic Fields. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12: 2–19.
Pacini S, Gulisano M, Peruzzi B, Sgambati E, Gheri G, Gheri Bryk S et al. Effects of 0.2 T static magnetic field on human skin fibroblasts. Cancer Detect Prev. 2003; 27: 327-32.
Tenuzzo B, Chionna A, Panzarini E, Lanubile R, Tarantino P, Di Jeso B et al. Biological effects of 6 mT static magnetic fields: A comparative study in different cell types. Bioelectromagnetics 2006; 27: 560-77.
Zhadin MN. Review of Russian literature on biological action of DC and low-frequency AC magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics 2001; 22: 27-45.
American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). Threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents and biological exposure indices. Cincinnati 2011.
International Labour Office. Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and Safety. 3rd Edition ed. Geneva: ILO; 1983.
Goldberg DP, Hillier V. A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychol Med 1979; 9: 139-45.
Noorbala AA, Bagheri Yazdi SA, Yasamy MT, Mohammad K. Mental health survey of the adult population in Iran. Br J Psychiatry. 2004; 184: 70-3.
Fakhar A, Ranjbar F, Dadashzadeh H, Moghaddas F. An epidemiological survey of mental disorders among adults in the north, west area of Tabriz, Iran. Pak J Med Sci. 2007; 23: 54-58.
Franco G, Perduri R, Murolo A. Health effects of occupational exposure to static magnetic fields used inmagnetic resonance imaging: a review. Med Lav 2008; 99: 16-28.
Choobineh A, Amirzadeh F. Health effects of occupational exposure to static magnetic field in a chloralkali plant. Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2005; 9: 76.
Yousefi HA, Nasiri P. Psychological Effects of Occupational Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields. Journal of Research in Health Science 2006; 6: 18-21.
de Vocht F, van Drooge H, Engels H, Kromhout H. Exposure, health complaints and cognitive performance among employees of an MRI scanners manufacturing department. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 23: 197-204.
Schenck JF, Dumoulin CL, Redington RW, Kressel HY, Elliott RT, McDougall IL. Human exposure to 4.0-Tesla magnetic fields in a whole-body scanner. Med Phys 1992; 19: 1089-98.
Shellock FG. Magnetic resonance procedures: health effects and safety: Taylor & Francis US; 2001.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/jss.v1i2.8485
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2015 Mohammad Reza Ghotbi, Hossein Mardi, Narges Khanjani, Nooshin Parvaresh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Journal of Safety Studies ISSN 2377-3219
Copyright © Macrothink Institute
To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'macrothink.org' domains to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', please check your 'spam' or 'junk' folder.