Revisiting the Role of Bilateral Investment Treaties in Foreign Direct Investment

Alessandro Cusimano, Eun Sun Godwin, Stephen McKay, Metka Potocnik

Abstract


This article revisits the role of Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) in Foreign Direct Investment (FDI). It investigates, in particular, the institutional quality of the host countries, the number of cases brought for resolution, plus a more nuanced formulation of numbers of BITs, focusing on developing host countries.

The analysis looks at more recent developments in BITs and incorporates economic freedom as a proxy of institutional quality of the host countries and considers the number of Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) in the BITs. We assume a non-linear relationship between BIT and FDI. Models are run using feasible generalized least squares (FGLS). Our new findings reveal that there is an optimum level of BITs in attracting FDI (higher and lower numbers do worse), constituting a re-appraisal of past analyses. Previous ISDS cases show a significant negative relationship with FDI. Economic Freedom has a strong positive and significant relationship with FDI/GDP, as previously found.

 


Full Text:

PDF


DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/rae.v16i2.22030

Copyright (c) 2024 Alessandro Cusimano, Eun Sun Godwin, Stephen McKay, Metka Potocnik

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Research in Applied Economics ISSN 1948-5433

Email: rae@macrothink.org

Copyright © Macrothink Institute   



To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'macrothink.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.