Factors Influencing the Professional Skepticism of Independent Auditors in Financial Statement Audits
Abstract
The author employed a qualitative research method by soliciting the opinions of experts in the field of auditing. From this, the author identified five primary factors influencing professional skepticism, which include: the auditors' professional knowledge and experience, the auditors' ethical standards, the auditors' personality, the relationships between auditors and their superiors, colleagues, and clients, as well as the workload. Through quantitative research methods, the author determined that three factors – auditors' professional knowledge and experience, auditors' ethical standards, and auditors' personality – positively affect the professional skepticism of independent auditors in financial statement audits.
Full Text:
PDFDOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/ber.v14i4.22357
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Truong Thi Thuy, Tran Thi Toan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Business and Economic Research ISSN 2162-4860
Copyright © Macrothink Institute
To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'macrothink.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------