Comparison of Simulation and Hands-on Labs in Helping High School Students Learn Physics Concepts

Matt Rytting, Geoff Wright, Steven Shumway, Jamie Jensen

Abstract


The purpose of the research was to determine whether PhET simulation labs or hands-on labs were more effective in helping students learn physics concepts. This measure was done by comparing quiz scores using recall, calculation, and transfer questions. Additionally, student perceptions of learning from both hands-on and simulation lab experiences were measured. Six labs were conducted with high school physics students on the topics of momentum, energy, circuits, angular momentum, pendulums, and friction. It was found that PhET simulation labs were as effective at creating student understanding, and sometimes more effective, as measured by quizzes given after the labs. Additionally, the survey data revealed that students were more engaged by hands-on lab experiences, and viewed the hands-on labs to be more effective than the simulation labs.


Full Text:

PDF


DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v11i1.14017

Copyright (c) 2019 Matt Rytting, Geoff Wright, Steven Shumway, Jamie Jensen

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Education ISSN 1948-5476

Email: ije@macrothink.org

Copyright © Macrothink Institute 


To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'macrothink.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.