Polar Express: Polar Question Forms Expressing Bias-Evidence Conflicts in Italian
Abstract
Past research has concentrated on the use of different forms of polar questions in specific contexts, defined in terms of the relationship between original bias and contextual evidence. It has been showed that, for English and German, people tend to prefer specific forms given the pragmatic context. Based on previous experiments, in this work, we observe that the same tendencies occur in Italian. Also, we adopt a more refined experimental setup with three different tasks and a more natural evaluation scale to better capture nuances in appropriateness evaluations, provided by human subjects, which therefore reflects the more realistic one-to-many relationship among forms and functions. In fact, the results show how specific forms of polar questions are especially typical of situations where the bias has the opposite value with respect to the evidence, i.e., in positive bias versus negative evidence, for which a high negative polar question in the past tense was more frequently selected by the subjects (Note 1).
Full Text:
PDFDOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v13i4.18871
Copyright (c) 2021 Maria Di Maro, Antonio Origlia, Francesco Cutugno
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
International Journal of Linguistics ISSN 1948-5425 Email: ijl@macrothink.org
Copyright © Macrothink Institute ISSN 1948-5425
To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'macrothink.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.